2002 Jaguar XKR vs. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XKR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XKR would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XKR (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 805 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XKR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XKR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XKR (553 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. 2002 Jaguar XKR has automatic transmission and 2011 Chevrolet Matiz has manual transmission. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XKR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar XKR | 2011 Chevrolet Matiz | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
| Model | XKR | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 553 Nm | 91 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.4 seconds | 14.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |
