2002 Jeep Compass vs. 1956 Packard Carribean
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Packard Carribean. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Packard Carribean would be higher. At 6,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Packard Carribean is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Packard Carribean (306 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Compass. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Packard Carribean should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Packard Carribean weights approximately 843 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Packard Carribean. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Compass | 1956 Packard Carribean | |
| Make | Jeep | Packard |
| Model | Compass | Carribean |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 6129 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 2249 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3240 mm |
