2002 Jeep Compass vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Compass | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 251 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2670 mm |