2002 Jeep Compass vs. 1977 Holden Kingswood
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden Kingswood (213 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Compass. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden Kingswood should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 26 kg more than 1977 Holden Kingswood.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Holden Kingswood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden Kingswood (400 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 1977 Holden Kingswood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 1977 Holden Kingswood | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Compass | Kingswood |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 5042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 213 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 400 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |