2002 Jeep Compass vs. 1981 Volvo 265
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 265. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 265 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 265. (230 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Compass | 1981 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | Compass | 265 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
