2002 Jeep Compass vs. 2003 Subaru Baja
To start off, 2003 Subaru Baja is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Baja. (164 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Baja. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru Baja weights approximately 174 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Baja. (225 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Baja.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 2003 Subaru Baja | |
Make | Jeep | Subaru |
Model | Compass | Baja |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 164 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 225 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |