2002 Jeep Compass vs. 2007 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2007 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 210 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Commander weights approximately 271 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Commander (320 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2007 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 2007 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | Compass | Commander |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2790 mm |