2002 Jeep Compass vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML (503 HP) has 293 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Compass. (210 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 904 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML (630 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Compass. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Compass | ML |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 503 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 630 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1406 kg | 2310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1951 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1862 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2913 mm |