2002 Jeep Compass vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jeep Compass has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jeep Compass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Compass | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Compass | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 177 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2360 mm |
