2002 Jeep Compass vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (232 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. 2002 Jeep Compass has automatic transmission and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jeep Compass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Compass | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Compass | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Crossover | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 232 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |