2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee (408 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Grand Cherokee | Fronte |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2060 mm |