2002 Jeep Willys 2 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Willys 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Willys 2 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-09 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Willys 2. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Willys 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 747 kg more than 2002 Jeep Willys 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (366 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Willys 2. (210 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-09 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Willys 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Willys 2 | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Willys 2 | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2875 mm |
