2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Jeep | Jeep |
| Model | Wrangler | CJ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1953 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |
