2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190. (155 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1954 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Wrangler | 190 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1895 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2410 mm |
