2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1954 Triumph TR2
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1954 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Triumph TR2.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Triumph TR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Triumph TR2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1954 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Jeep | Triumph |
Model | Wrangler | TR2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2250 mm |