2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1955 Oldsmobile 98
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Oldsmobile 98. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Oldsmobile 98 would be higher. At 5,320 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Oldsmobile 98 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Oldsmobile 98. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Oldsmobile 98 (450 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1955 Oldsmobile 98 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1955 Oldsmobile 98 | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Wrangler | 98 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 5320 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3210 mm |
