2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1961 Seat 1400
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1961 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1961 Seat 1400.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Seat 1400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Seat 1400. (88 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Seat 1400.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1961 Seat 1400 | |
Make | Jeep | Seat |
Model | Wrangler | 1400 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 88 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |