2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1963 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
Make | Jeep | Willys-Overland |
Model | Wrangler | Aero-Willys 2600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2464 cc | 2636 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |