2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (232 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1964 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Maserati Mistral. (315 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Maserati Mistral.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1964 Maserati Mistral | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | Wrangler | Mistral |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 3486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 315 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2410 mm |