2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1964 MG MGB
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGB would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1964 MG MGB. (89 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGB.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG MGB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1964 MG MGB | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Wrangler | MGB |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |