2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1964 Moretti 2500
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Moretti 2500 (143 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Moretti 2500 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1964 Moretti 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Moretti 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Moretti 2500. (187 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Moretti 2500.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1964 Moretti 2500 | |
Make | Jeep | Moretti |
Model | Wrangler | 2500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2454 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 187 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |