2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (153 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Wrangler | 144 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2620 mm |