2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1967 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1967 Volkswagen 1600. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1967 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volkswagen 1600. (110 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volkswagen 1600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1967 Volkswagen 1600 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volkswagen |
| Model | Wrangler | 1600 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |
