2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Wrangler | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2960 mm |