2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1973 ZIL 114
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1973 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 ZIL 114 (580 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1973 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1973 ZIL 114 | |
| Make | Jeep | ZIL |
| Model | Wrangler | 114 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 6959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 580 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3770 mm |
