2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (108 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (279 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
Model | Wrangler | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4269 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2850 mm |