2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 1940 mm |