2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1979 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 626 has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 626 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1979 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2520 mm |