2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1981 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Cougar. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mercury Cougar. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mercury Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1981 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Wrangler | Cougar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2690 mm |