2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1982 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. (133 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant Scimitar. (206 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1982 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Jeep | Reliant |
Model | Wrangler | Scimitar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2640 mm |