2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1989 Plymouth Laser
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Laser would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (142 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Plymouth Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1989 Plymouth Laser | |
| Make | Jeep | Plymouth |
| Model | Wrangler | Laser |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1755 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
