2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Jeep | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Wrangler | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |
