2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1991 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1991 Opel Omega. (110 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1991 Opel Omega.
Because 1991 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Opel Omega. (162 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1991 Opel Omega | |
Make | Jeep | Opel |
Model | Wrangler | Omega |
Year Released | 2002 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2740 mm |