2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1993 Kia Capital
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Kia Capital. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Kia Capital would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1993 Kia Capital. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1993 Kia Capital.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Kia Capital. (152 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Kia Capital. 1993 Kia Capital has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Kia Capital will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1993 Kia Capital | |
| Make | Jeep | Kia |
| Model | Wrangler | Capital |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2530 mm |
