2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1994 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1994 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1994 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 296 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |