2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lancia Kappa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lancia Kappa would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (173 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lancia Kappa. (230 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Jeep | Lancia |
Model | Wrangler | Kappa |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2451 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |