2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | Wrangler | 400 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 123 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |