2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jeep | Renault |
| Model | Wrangler | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2580 mm |
