2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (403 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (580 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | C 112 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 5987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 580 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |