2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | Wrangler | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |