2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.

Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (205 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6. 2003 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Jeep Wrangler 2003 Mazda 6
Make Jeep Mazda
Model Wrangler 6
Year Released 2002 2003
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3960 cc 2261 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 141 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 205 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Vehicle Length 3950 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2680 mm