2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 406 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2003 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2003 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Jeep | Pagani |
Model | Wrangler | Zonda |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 547 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 750 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |