2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Swift is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Swift.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (76 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Swift |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 76 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2270 mm |