2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Maserati Spyder
To start off, 2004 Maserati Spyder is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,254 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2004 Maserati Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maserati Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Spyder (447 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Spyder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Maserati Spyder | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Wrangler | Spyder |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4254 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2450 mm |
