2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Jeep | Rover |
Model | Wrangler | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |