2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2004 Samsung SM3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2004 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3. 2004 Samsung SM3 has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Samsung SM3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Jeep | Samsung |
Model | Wrangler | SM3 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2540 mm |