2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2006 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2006 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 616 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Koenigsegg CCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm) has 600 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2006 Koenigsegg CCX | |
| Make | Jeep | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Wrangler | CCX |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 806 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 919 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |
