2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C (161 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2007 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | C |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |