2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (228 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Wrangler | SLK |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2440 mm |