2002 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (322 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera | |
| Make | Jeep | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Wrangler | Brera |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 3195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2710 mm |
